PRAHA (20. 8. 2005) – Form\u00e1ln\u00ed nedostatek zap\u0159\u00ed\u010dinil odvol\u00e1n\u00ed spr\u00e1vkyn\u011b konkurzn\u00ed podstaty Union banky Michaely Huserov\u00e9 z funkce. P\u0159inejhor\u0161\u00edm to m\u016f\u017ee znamenat vr\u00e1cen\u00ed konkurzu zkrachovan\u00e9 banky do bodu "nula" a nav\u00edc zpochybn\u011bn\u00ed v\u0161ech dosud ukon\u010den\u00fdch konkurz\u016f. <\/p>\n
Krach Union banky postihl skoro 75 tis\u00edc v\u011b\u0159itel\u016f s uznan\u00fdmi pohled\u00e1vkami ve v\u00fd\u0161i 15 miliard korun. Nejv\u011bt\u0161\u00edm v\u011b\u0159itelem je Fond poji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed vklad\u016f s 12,5 miliardy korun. Spr\u00e1vkyn\u00ed konkurzn\u00ed podstaty byla jmenov\u00e1na Michaela Huserov\u00e1, kter\u00e1 po patn\u00e1cti m\u011bs\u00edc\u00edch po osudn\u00e9m krachu m\u011bla p\u0159ipraveno k v\u00fdplat\u011b u\u017e \u0161est miliard korun. Huserov\u00e1 se c\u00edtila b\u00fdt v sedle.<\/p>\n
"V\u00fdt\u011b\u017enost konkurzu o\u010dek\u00e1v\u00e1me ve v\u00fd\u0161i 34 procent. To by byl ve srovn\u00e1n\u00ed s pr\u016fm\u011brn\u00fdm v\u00fdnosem z konkurz\u016f ve v\u00fd\u0161i p\u011bti a\u017e sedmi procent velk\u00fd \u00fasp\u011bch,"uvedla Huserov\u00e1 v polovin\u011b roku 2004. Jej\u00ed vize se ale z\u0159ejm\u011b nenapln\u00ed, byla p\u0159ed n\u011bkolika t\u00fddny z funkce odvol\u00e1na. P\u0159\u00ed\u010dinou je pon\u011bkud form\u00e1ln\u00ed opomenut\u00ed, na kter\u00e9 upozornila mimo jin\u00e9 spole\u010dnost GEN. Huserov\u00e1 toti\u017e nezalo\u017eila \u00fapln\u00fd soupis majetku do soudn\u00edho spisu, m\u011bla jej ulo\u017een ve sv\u00e9m trezoru, co\u017e je celkem b\u011b\u017en\u00e1 praxe.<\/p>\n
Prvn\u00ed soupis majetku vznikl 30. kv\u011btna 2003, den po prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed konkurzu, postupn\u011b se dopl\u0148oval a do soudn\u00edho spisu byl zalo\u017een 5. b\u0159ezna 2004. Toto form\u00e1ln\u00ed opomenut\u00ed – z\u00e1kon o konkurzu to p\u0159\u00edmo nevy\u017eaduje a ne\u0159\u00edk\u00e1, kde m\u00e1 b\u00fdt soupis majetku ulo\u017een – st\u00e1lo Huserovou m\u00edsto, a to i p\u0159esto, \u017ee soud m\u011bl na vybranou celou \u0161k\u00e1lu mnohem m\u00edrn\u011bj\u0161\u00edch trest\u016f.<\/p>\n
"Vrchn\u00ed soud p\u0159ik\u00e1zal krajsk\u00e9mu soudu, aby vym\u011bnil spr\u00e1vce," uvedla Eva Kijonkov\u00e1, medi\u00e1ln\u00ed z\u00e1stupkyn\u011b Huserov\u00e9. Kritici toti\u017e tvrd\u00ed, \u017ee spr\u00e1vkyn\u011b prod\u00e1vala majetek, kter\u00fd nebyl v seznamu. "Majetek jsem sama prod\u00e1vat nemohla. Nab\u00eddky se otev\u00edraly za p\u0159\u00edtomnosti v\u00fdboru v\u011b\u0159itel\u016f a prodej 24 nemovitost\u00ed p\u0159inesl nav\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed ceny z p\u016fvodn\u00edch 151 milion\u016f a\u017e na kone\u010dn\u00fdch 183 milion\u016f a kone\u010dn\u00fd prodej se uskute\u010dnil a\u017e na z\u00e1klad\u011b usnesen\u00ed soudu," uvedla Huserov\u00e1. "Dal\u0161\u00ed spole\u010dnosti, kter\u00e9 konkurz zpochyb\u0148uj\u00ed, se v\u00fdb\u011brov\u00e9ho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed v\u016fbec nez\u00fa\u010dastnily a po zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00ed v\u00edt\u011bzn\u00e9 ceny poslaly jakousi nab\u00eddku a pod\u00e1vaj\u00ed \u017ealobu," \u0159ekla Huserov\u00e1.<\/p>\n
\u00datok na spr\u00e1vkyni konkurzn\u00ed podstaty a na cel\u00fd v\u011b\u0159itelsk\u00fd v\u00fdbor, kter\u00fd nab\u00eddky hodnotil, a nakonec i na soud, kter\u00fd je "posv\u011btil", m\u016f\u017ee zpochybnit cel\u00fd konkurz, a t\u00edm ohrozit 75 tis\u00edc v\u011b\u0159itel\u016f. Objevuj\u00ed se tak\u00e9 dal\u0161\u00ed spekulace – velk\u00fdch konkurz\u016f, p\u0159\u00edle\u017eitost\u00ed pro konkurzn\u00ed spr\u00e1vce vyd\u011blat si velk\u00e9 pen\u00edze, ub\u00fdv\u00e1. Cel\u00e1 \u0159ada zpochybn\u011bn\u00fdch konkurz\u016f, je p\u0159\u00edle\u017eitost\u00ed k v\u00fdd\u011blk\u016fm pro ty, na kter\u00e9 se nedostalo. <\/p>\n
Nov\u00fdm konkurzn\u00edm spr\u00e1vcem se v\u010dera stal Luk\u00e1\u0161 Raida. Huserov\u00e1 podala dovol\u00e1n\u00ed k Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edmu soudu<\/p>\n
Zdroj: Vltava-Labe-Press<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
PRAHA (20. 8. 2005) – Form\u00e1ln\u00ed nedostatek zap\u0159\u00ed\u010dinil odvol\u00e1n\u00ed spr\u00e1vkyn\u011b konkurzn\u00ed podstaty Union banky Michaely Huserov\u00e9 z funkce. P\u0159inejhor\u0161\u00edm to m\u016f\u017ee znamenat vr\u00e1cen\u00ed konkurzu zkrachovan\u00e9 banky do bodu "nula" a nav\u00edc zpochybn\u011bn\u00ed v\u0161ech dosud ukon\u010den\u00fdch konkurz\u016f. Krach Union banky postihl skoro 75 tis\u00edc v\u011b\u0159itel\u016f s uznan\u00fdmi pohled\u00e1vkami ve v\u00fd\u0161i 15 miliard korun. Nejv\u011bt\u0161\u00edm v\u011b\u0159itelem je\u2026 Cel\u00fd \u010dl\u00e1nek »<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/837"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=837"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/837\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=837"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=837"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=837"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}