OSTRAVA (23. 9. 2005) – Sto osmdes\u00e1t t\u0159i milion\u016f korun, kter\u00e9 konkurzn\u00ed spr\u00e1va Union banky z\u00edskala za prodej \u010dty\u0159iadvaceti nemovitost\u00ed, se je\u0161t\u011b n\u011bkolik let nemus\u00ed dostat k v\u011b\u0159itel\u016fm zkrachoval\u00e9 banky. Jsou toti\u017e zablokov\u00e1ny v not\u00e1\u0159sk\u00e9 \u00faschov\u011b kv\u016fli \u017ealob\u00e1m spole\u010dnosti G. E. N. Tento ne\u00fasp\u011b\u0161n\u00fd uchaze\u010d o budovy, kter\u00e9 banka vlastnila po cel\u00e9 republice, napadl jejich prodej firm\u011b Aspana Holding. A kv\u016fli \u017ealob\u011b nen\u00ed mo\u017en\u00e9 nemovitosti p\u0159epsat na katastrech a pen\u00edze na \u00fa\u010det Union banky ve prosp\u011bch v\u011b\u0159itel\u016f p\u0159ev\u00e9st.<\/p>\n
Nov\u00fd spr\u00e1vce konkurzn\u00ed podstaty Union banky Luk\u00e1\u0161 Raida proto jako jeden z prvn\u00edch krok\u016f po n\u00e1stupu do funkce nechal prov\u00e9st anal\u00fdzu, kter\u00e1 zkoumala nab\u00eddku spole\u010dnosti Aspana, a z kter\u00e9 vypl\u00fdv\u00e1, \u017ee k dodate\u010dn\u00e9mu p\u0159eps\u00e1n\u00ed v\u00fd\u0161e kupn\u00ed ceny v nab\u00eddce, jak tvrd\u00ed ne\u00fasp\u011b\u0161n\u00fd G. E. N., nemohlo doj\u00edt. \u201eProdej nemovitost\u00ed byl zcela v po\u0159\u00e1dku,\u201c sd\u011blil Raida. Ten je p\u0159esv\u011bd\u010den, \u017ee \u017ealoba spole\u010dnosti G. E. N. nem\u00e1 nad\u011bji na \u00fasp\u011bch a bude nakonec zam\u00edtnuta. \u201eProbl\u00e9mem je, \u017ee soudn\u00ed spor bude trvat n\u011bkolik let,\u201c sd\u011blil Raida.<\/p>\n
Raida chce, aby G. E. N. svou \u017ealobu st\u00e1hl. \u201eG. E. N. by se m\u011bl sm\u00ed\u0159it se skute\u010dnost\u00ed, \u017ee nenab\u00eddl v procesu prodeje nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed cenu a m\u011bl by upustit od \u0161ikan\u00f3zn\u00edch \u017ealob a po\u0161kozov\u00e1n\u00ed z\u00e1jmu sedmdes\u00e1ti p\u011bti tis\u00edc\u016f v\u011b\u0159itel\u016f banky,\u201c m\u00edn\u00ed Raida. Nab\u00eddka spole\u010dnosti G. E. N. byla o necel\u00e9 dva miliony ni\u017e\u0161\u00ed. <\/p>\n
Ve sporu proti sob\u011b stoj\u00ed dva znaleck\u00e9 posudky. Tak\u00e9 spole\u010dnost G. E. N. m\u00e1 toti\u017e k dispozici grafologick\u00fd posudek soudn\u00edho znalce a ten pozm\u011bn\u011bn\u00ed kupn\u00ed ceny p\u0159ipustil. Podle Raidy v\u0161ak tato anal\u00fdza nen\u00ed relevantn\u00ed, proto\u017ee znalec v tomto p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b nezkoumal origin\u00e1l nab\u00eddky, ale pouze kopii. Nikoho z veden\u00ed spole\u010dnosti G. E. N. se v\u010dera redakci nepoda\u0159ilo zastihnout.<\/p>\n
G. E. N. z \u00fadajn\u00e9ho p\u0159eps\u00e1n\u00ed kupn\u00ed ceny vin\u00ed b\u00fdvalou konkurzn\u00ed spr\u00e1vkyni Michaelu Huserovou, kterou kv\u016fli chyb\u00e1m v konkurzu odvolal Vrchn\u00ed soud v Olomouci. Huserov\u00e1 zmanipulov\u00e1n\u00ed prodeje nemovitost\u00ed odm\u00edt\u00e1. \u201e\u017d\u00e1dnou nab\u00eddku jsem nep\u0159episovala, je to podlo\u017eeno anal\u00fdzou i prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00edm spole\u010dnosti Aspana,\u201c uvedla v\u010dera Huserov\u00e1. Ta u\u017e kv\u016fli sv\u00e9mu ned\u00e1vn\u00e9mu odvol\u00e1n\u00ed podala dovol\u00e1n\u00ed k Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edmu soudu a v nejbli\u017e\u0161\u00edch dnech chce podat i \u00fastavn\u00ed st\u00ed\u017enost. \u201eRozhodnut\u00edm Vrchn\u00edho soudu v Olomouci o m\u00e9m odvol\u00e1n\u00ed byla po\u0161kozena moje profesion\u00e1ln\u00ed \u010dest. Chyby, kter\u00e9 mi Vrchn\u00ed soud vyt\u00fdkal, nemaj\u00ed oporu v z\u00e1konech,\u201c dodala.<\/p>\n
Navzdory komplikac\u00edm v konkurzu chce Raida v p\u0159\u00ed\u0161t\u00edm roce vyplatit v\u011b\u0159itel\u016fm dal\u0161\u00ed pen\u00edze. V\u011b\u0159itel\u00e9 by podle n\u011bj mohli z\u00edskat p\u011bt a\u017e deset procent z uznan\u00fdch pohled\u00e1vek, tedy maxim\u00e1ln\u011b 1,5 miliardy korun. Na \u00fa\u010dtech Union banky jsou nyn\u00ed t\u0159i miliardy korun. Ostravsk\u00e1 Union banka zat\u00edm z\u00edskala v konkurzu asi \u0161est miliard korun a polovinu z nich u\u017e v\u011b\u0159itel\u016fm vyplatila. <\/p>\n
Zdroj: Moravskoslezsk\u00fd den\u00edk<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
OSTRAVA (23. 9. 2005) – Sto osmdes\u00e1t t\u0159i milion\u016f korun, kter\u00e9 konkurzn\u00ed spr\u00e1va Union banky z\u00edskala za prodej \u010dty\u0159iadvaceti nemovitost\u00ed, se je\u0161t\u011b n\u011bkolik let nemus\u00ed dostat k v\u011b\u0159itel\u016fm zkrachoval\u00e9 banky. Jsou toti\u017e zablokov\u00e1ny v not\u00e1\u0159sk\u00e9 \u00faschov\u011b kv\u016fli \u017ealob\u00e1m spole\u010dnosti G. E. N. Tento ne\u00fasp\u011b\u0161n\u00fd uchaze\u010d o budovy, kter\u00e9 banka vlastnila po cel\u00e9 republice, napadl jejich\u2026 Cel\u00fd \u010dl\u00e1nek »<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/847"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=847"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/847\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=847"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=847"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=847"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}