PRAHA (4. 5. 2006) – St\u00e1tn\u00ed \u010cesk\u00e9 konsolida\u010dn\u00ed agentu\u0159e (\u010cKA) hroz\u00ed, \u017ee p\u0159ijde nejm\u00e9n\u011b o \u010dty\u0159iadvacet mili\u00f3n\u016f korun, je\u017e mohla z\u00edskat p\u0159i konkursu ostravsk\u00e9 Union banky. \u00da\u0159edn\u00edci \u010cKA se toti\u017e do konkursn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed v\u010das nep\u0159ihl\u00e1sili. N\u00e1rok \u010cKA souvis\u00ed se starou pohled\u00e1vkou, kterou Union banka u\u017e p\u0159ed \u0161esti lety p\u0159evzala od Vag\u00f3nky Stud\u00e9nka p\u0159i vypo\u0159\u00e1d\u00e1n\u00ed dluh\u016f t\u00e9to stroj\u00edrensk\u00e9 firmy.<\/p>\n
Sama pohled\u00e1vka vznikla nesrovnalostmi p\u0159i oce\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed Vag\u00f3nky p\u0159i jej\u00ed privatizaci po\u010d\u00e1tkem 90. let a dlouho nebylo jasn\u00e9, je-li v\u016fbec opr\u00e1vn\u011bn\u00e1. Vag\u00f3nka a pozd\u011bji Union banka se o ni p\u0159es deset let soudily. Letos v b\u0159eznu v\u0161ak platnost pohled\u00e1vky definitivn\u011b potvrdil pra\u017esk\u00fd M\u011bstsk\u00fd soud. \u00bbPodle jeho rozhodnut\u00ed m\u00e1me z\u00edskat do konkursn\u00ed podstaty sedmdes\u00e1t mili\u00f3n\u016f korun plus \u00faroky a pen\u00e1le, celkov\u011b jde ke dne\u0161n\u00edmu dni o 170 mili\u00f3n\u016f,\u00ab \u0159ekl mluv\u010d\u00ed konkursn\u00edho spr\u00e1vce Union banky Old\u0159ich Babick\u00fd.<\/p>\n
O v\u00fdnos z pohled\u00e1vky se Union banka bude muset rozd\u011blit s dal\u0161\u00edmi dv\u011bma zkrachoval\u00fdmi bankovn\u00edmi domy – s Agrobankou a Moravia bankou. \u010cty\u0159icet procent z vysouzen\u00e9 \u010d\u00e1stky, mohla v konkursu \u017e\u00e1dat i st\u00e1tn\u00ed agentura. Jenom\u017ee to neud\u011blala. <\/p>\n
Pohled\u00e1vka m\u00edsto spl\u00e1tek <\/p>\n
Union banka pohled\u00e1vku dostala v roce 2000 jako \u010d\u00e1ste\u010dnou kompenzaci za nesplacen\u00fd dluh. Vag\u00f3nka kdysi z\u00edskala \u00fav\u011br od Union banky a dal\u0161\u00edch t\u0159\u00ed partner\u016f, jimi\u017e byli pr\u00e1v\u011b Moravia banka, Agrobanka a st\u00e1tn\u00ed konsolida\u010dn\u00ed agentura.<\/p>\n
Union banka byla spr\u00e1vcem cel\u00e9ho \u00fav\u011bru pro vag\u00f3nku, a proto se vym\u00e1h\u00e1n\u00ed sporn\u00e9 pohled\u00e1vky u soud\u016f ujala sama. Kdy\u017e v roce 2003 upadla Union banka do konkursu, dal\u0161\u00ed dv\u011b soukrom\u00e9 banky se ihned o sv\u00e9 pod\u00edly na budouc\u00edm v\u00fdt\u011b\u017eku z pohled\u00e1vky p\u0159ihl\u00e1sily. \u010cesk\u00e1 konsolida\u010dn\u00ed agentura se tehdy neozvala.<\/p>\n
\u00bbMoravia banka i Agrobanka maj\u00ed prakticky jist\u00e9, \u017ee ze sv\u00fdch pod\u00edl\u016f z pohled\u00e1vky dostanou do sv\u00fdch konkursn\u00edch podstat zhruba 34 procenta sv\u00e9ho n\u00e1roku. Tolik toti\u017e \u010din\u00ed v\u00fdt\u011b\u017eek z konkursu Union banky,\u00ab prohl\u00e1sil Babick\u00fd.<\/p>\n
Konkursn\u00ed spr\u00e1vce Union banky sice zpo\u010d\u00e1tku n\u00e1roky obou zm\u00edn\u011bn\u00fdch bankovn\u00edch dom\u016f pop\u00edral, podle Babick\u00e9ho ale jen \u010dekal na v\u00fdsledek soud\u016f o platnost pohled\u00e1vky. Te\u010f pr\u00fd se v\u00fdplat\u011b jejich pod\u00edl\u016f br\u00e1nit nebude. S v\u00fdplatnou pen\u011bz \u010cesk\u00e9 konsolida\u010dn\u00ed agentu\u0159e ov\u0161em konkursn\u00ed spr\u00e1vce Union banky nepo\u010d\u00edt\u00e1.<\/p>\n
Kdy\u017e se v b\u0159eznu uk\u00e1zalo, \u017ee Union banka ze star\u00e9 pohled\u00e1vky z\u00edsk\u00e1 pen\u00edze a \u010cKA se ke sv\u00e9mu pod\u00edlu z nich nedostane, obr\u00e1tili se jej\u00ed pr\u00e1vn\u00edci na ostravsk\u00fd soud. <\/p>\n
Soud \u010cKA zat\u00edm nepomohl <\/p>\n
\u010cKA \u017e\u00e1dala, aby soud p\u0159edb\u011b\u017en\u00fdm opat\u0159en\u00edm zabr\u00e1nil z\u00e1pisu 170 vysouzen\u00fdch mili\u00f3n\u016f do konkursn\u00ed podstaty Union banky. \u00bbN\u00e1vrh jsem ale zam\u00edtl,\u00ab sd\u011blil v\u010dera HN ostravsk\u00fd soudce Rostislav Krhut.<\/p>\n
\u010cKA nicm\u00e9n\u011b st\u00e1le douf\u00e1, \u017ee sv\u016fj d\u00edl z vysouzen\u00e9 pohled\u00e1vky v Ostrav\u011b dostane. \u00bbCel\u00e1 pohled\u00e1vka byla do konkursn\u00ed podstaty Union banky za\u0159azena nepr\u00e1vem. V p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b, \u017ee Union banka \u010cesk\u00e9 konsolida\u010dn\u00ed agentu\u0159e pod\u00edl nevyplat\u00ed, budeme se ho dom\u00e1hat soudn\u00ed cestou,\u00ab pl\u00e1nuje mluv\u010d\u00ed \u010cKA Ji\u0159\u00ed Pek\u00e1rek. <\/p>\n
O co v kauze jde <\/p>\n
* Konsolida\u010dn\u00ed agentura \u017e\u00e1d\u00e1 40procentn\u00ed pod\u00edl z pohled\u00e1vky, je\u017e z\u010d\u00e1sti hradila nespl\u00e1cen\u00fd \u00fav\u011br Vag\u00f3nky Stud\u00e9nka. \u00dav\u011br Vag\u00f3nce kdysi poskytly spole\u010dn\u011b Konsolida\u010dn\u00ed agentura, Union banka, Moravia banka a Agrobanka.<\/p>\n
* Pohled\u00e1vku spravuje Union banka, kter\u00e1 se o jej\u00ed platnost soudila. V b\u0159eznu soud potvrdil, \u017ee Union banka dostane 70 mili\u00f3n\u016f i s p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161enstv\u00edm, celkem 170 mili\u00f3n\u016f korun.<\/p>\n
* Union banka se o v\u00fdt\u011b\u017eek rozd\u011bl\u00ed s Moravia bankou a Agrobankou (ob\u011b v konkursu). V\u00fdplatu pod\u00edlu \u010cKA nepl\u00e1nuje. \u010cKA toti\u017e nep\u0159ihl\u00e1sila sv\u016fj n\u00e1rok do konkursn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed.<\/p>\n
Zdroj: Hospod\u00e1\u0159sk\u00e9 noviny<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
PRAHA (4. 5. 2006) – St\u00e1tn\u00ed \u010cesk\u00e9 konsolida\u010dn\u00ed agentu\u0159e (\u010cKA) hroz\u00ed, \u017ee p\u0159ijde nejm\u00e9n\u011b o \u010dty\u0159iadvacet mili\u00f3n\u016f korun, je\u017e mohla z\u00edskat p\u0159i konkursu ostravsk\u00e9 Union banky. \u00da\u0159edn\u00edci \u010cKA se toti\u017e do konkursn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed v\u010das nep\u0159ihl\u00e1sili. N\u00e1rok \u010cKA souvis\u00ed se starou pohled\u00e1vkou, kterou Union banka u\u017e p\u0159ed \u0161esti lety p\u0159evzala od Vag\u00f3nky Stud\u00e9nka p\u0159i vypo\u0159\u00e1d\u00e1n\u00ed dluh\u016f\u2026 Cel\u00fd \u010dl\u00e1nek »<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/890"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=890"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/890\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=890"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=890"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=890"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}