Dne 19.12.1995 byla uzav\u0159ena Smlouva o sdru\u017een\u00ed mezi Konsolida\u010dn\u00ed bankou Praha, s.p.\u00fa. s pod\u00edlem 40,8%, Union bankou, a.s. s pod\u00edlem 29,6%, Moravia bankou, a.s. s pod\u00edlem 14,8% a Agrobankou Praha, a.s. s pod\u00edlem 14,8%, a to za \u00fa\u010delem sdru\u017een\u00ed \u00fav\u011brov\u00fdch prost\u0159edk\u016f k financov\u00e1n\u00ed spole\u010dnosti Moravskoslezsk\u00e1 vag\u00f3nka a.s. <\/p>\n
Pohled\u00e1vka, o kterou byl veden soudn\u00ed spor mezi Union bankou jako \u017ealobcem a Ministerstvem financ\u00ed \u010cesk\u00e9 republiky (d\u0159\u00edve Fondem n\u00e1rodn\u00edho majetku) jako \u017ealovan\u00fdm vznikla na z\u00e1klad\u011b nespln\u011bn\u00ed z\u00e1vazku Fondu n\u00e1rodn\u00edho majetku \u010cesk\u00e9 republiky, jako zakladatele Moravskoslezsk\u00e9 vag\u00f3nky splatit z\u00e1kladn\u00ed jm\u011bn\u00ed zakl\u00e1dan\u00e9 akciov\u00e9 spole\u010dnosti ve v\u00fd\u0161i 714 280 mil. K\u010d a p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161n\u00e9ho rezervn\u00edho fondu ve v\u00fd\u0161i 71 428 mil. K\u010d, kter\u00e1\u017eto \u010d\u00e1stka byla stanovena zakl\u00e1dac\u00ed listinou a vyjad\u0159ovala hodnotu nepen\u011b\u017eit\u00e9ho vkladu p\u0159i zalo\u017een\u00ed spole\u010dnosti dne 3.12.1993. Tato pohled\u00e1vka Moravskoslezsk\u00e9 vagonky byla v minulosti postoupena na Union banku a po prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed konkursu na majetek Union banky byla v pln\u00e9 v\u00fd\u0161i seps\u00e1na do soupisu konkursn\u00ed podstaty.<\/p>\n
Prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00edm konkursu na Union banku, a.s. \u201ev likvidaci\u201c dne 29.5.2003 vznikly \u010dlen\u016fm sdru\u017een\u00ed podm\u00edn\u011bn\u00e9 pohled\u00e1vky v\u016f\u010di \u00fapadci ve smyslu \u00a7 20 odst. 4 ZKV. Podm\u00ednkou vzniku t\u011bchto pohled\u00e1vek bylo re\u00e1ln\u00e9 zinkasov\u00e1n\u00ed pohled\u00e1vky za Fondem n\u00e1rodn\u00edho majetku Union bankou. Ve smyslu ustanoven\u00ed \u00a7 22 odst.2 z\u00e1kona \u010d. 328\/1991 Sb. o konkursu a vyrovn\u00e1n\u00ed, se k pohled\u00e1vk\u00e1m, kter\u00e9 by byly p\u0159ihl\u00e1\u0161eny pozd\u011bji ne\u017e dva m\u011bs\u00edce od prvn\u00edho p\u0159ezkumn\u00e9ho jedn\u00e1n\u00ed, nep\u0159ihl\u00ed\u017e\u00ed.<\/p>\n
\u010clenov\u00e9 sdru\u017een\u00ed, konkr\u00e9tn\u011b spr\u00e1vce konkursn\u00ed podstaty \u00fapadce Moravia banka, a.s. v likvidaci a likvid\u00e1tor Agrobanky Praha, a.s. v likvidaci podali v\u010das do konkursn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed podm\u00edn\u011bn\u00e9 p\u0159ihl\u00e1\u0161ky pohled\u00e1vek.<\/p>\n
\u010cesk\u00e1 konsolida\u010dn\u00ed agentura p\u0159ihl\u00e1\u0161ku sv\u00e9 pohled\u00e1vky v t\u00e9to v\u011bci dosud nepodala.<\/p>\n
S ohledem na skute\u010dnost, \u017ee pr\u00e1vn\u00ed n\u00e1zory jednotliv\u00fdch \u010dlen\u016f sdru\u017een\u00ed a zn\u011bj vypl\u00fdvaj\u00edc\u00ed postupy se li\u0161\u00ed, v\u00edt\u00e1 spr\u00e1vce konkursn\u00ed podstaty Union banky avizovanou \u017ealobu \u010cKA, kdy\u017e toliko soud m\u016f\u017ee v t\u00e9to v\u011bci vydat rozhodnut\u00ed, kter\u00e9 bude z\u00e1vazn\u00e9 pro v\u0161echny z\u00fa\u010dastn\u011bn\u00e9. Do doby rozhodnut\u00ed soudu v\u0161ak spr\u00e1vce Union banky nebude v z\u00e1jmu 75.000 konkursn\u00edch v\u011b\u0159itel\u016f na \u00fakor konkursn\u00ed podstaty \u010dlen\u016fm sdru\u017een\u00ed vypl\u00e1cet \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 finan\u010dn\u00ed \u010d\u00e1stky.<\/p>\n
Spr\u00e1vce konkursn\u00ed podstaty sou\u010dasn\u011b konstatuje, \u017ee \u010cKA dosud nepodala \u017e\u00e1dnou \u017ealobu, jej\u00edm\u017e p\u0159edm\u011btem by bylo vypo\u0159\u00e1d\u00e1n\u00ed jej\u00edho n\u00e1roku z titulu \u010dlenstv\u00ed ve sdru\u017een\u00ed, ani \u017ealobu na vylou\u010den\u00ed sv\u00e9ho pod\u00edlu na pohled\u00e1vce za Ministerstvem financ\u00ed ze soupisu konkursn\u00ed podstaty Union banky ve smyslu ustanoven\u00ed \u00a7 19 z\u00e1kona \u010d. 328\/1991 Sb. o konkursu a vyrovn\u00e1n\u00ed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Dne 19.12.1995 byla uzav\u0159ena Smlouva o sdru\u017een\u00ed mezi Konsolida\u010dn\u00ed bankou Praha, s.p.\u00fa. s pod\u00edlem 40,8%, Union bankou, a.s. s pod\u00edlem 29,6%, Moravia bankou, a.s. s pod\u00edlem 14,8% a Agrobankou Praha, a.s. s pod\u00edlem 14,8%, a to za \u00fa\u010delem sdru\u017een\u00ed \u00fav\u011brov\u00fdch prost\u0159edk\u016f k financov\u00e1n\u00ed spole\u010dnosti Moravskoslezsk\u00e1 vag\u00f3nka a.s. Pohled\u00e1vka, o kterou byl veden soudn\u00ed spor mezi\u2026 Cel\u00fd \u010dl\u00e1nek »<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/893"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=893"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/893\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=893"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=893"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionbanka.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=893"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}